Abstract
Diabetic foot complications are the most common cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations and uncontrolled infections represent a major risk factor. This open prospective, multicenter trial compared the efficacy of two antibiotic regimens for treatment of foot infections Wagner stage II or III in diabetic adults. Three hundred diabetic patients with severe, limb-threatening foot infection were consecutively enrolled in a prospective, observational, matched pairs controlled study to test two different antibiotic regimes (ceftriaxone vs chinolones) in addition to standard treatment of foot infection. After matching, 90 patients--each receiving ceftriaxone or chinolones--were analyzed. Our study demonstrated that treatment with a third generation cephalosporine is as effective as a treatment with chinolones. Response (reaching Wagner I or 0) was achieved in 58.0% in the ceftriaxone group and in 51.1% in the chinolone group (NS.). Fourteen days after initiation of treatment, the number of patients with microbiological isolates decreased in both groups (52 to 5 in the ceftriaxone group and 60 to 12 in the chinolone group). At hospital discharge, 66.0% of ceftriaxone and 64.4 of chinolone-treated diabetic ulcers were cured or improved. In summary, both substances proved to be effective in the primary antibiotic treatment of the diabetic foot; an early broad spectrum antibiotic treatment, that covers both gram-positive and gram negative bacteria as well as anerobes is undisputedly an imperative therapeutic intervention for the treatment of diabetic foot infection.
